Subscribe Today!
Place An Ad
Welcome
Search: Site   Web
| Print Story | E-Mail Story | Font Size

Attorney deal bad business

On Jan. 26, the Corning City Council voted 3-2 to approve a generous agreement with the city's part-time city attorney.

The agreement will give Michael Fitzpatrick an annual salary in 2010 of $73,320, automatically increasing to $79,596 in 2011. A new clause was also added granting the attorney 60 days termination pay in the event the agreement is ever canceled.

In addition to being the part-time attorney for Corning, Fitzpatrick is also the city attorney for Anderson and Orland - and his Web site shows that he also represents seven other public agencies and two corporate clients, in addition to representing individual clients. Fitzpatrick is a sole practitioner with only two clerical employees. How many taxpayers and voters - assuming they are lucky enough to even have a job in this economy - make over $70,000 annually from working a part-time job?

Mayor Strack defends the agreement by saying that Fitzpatrick absorbed $20,000 worth of litigation hours in 2009 as part of his salary. At best this is fuzzy math and a ridiculous argument. Deducting $20,000 from $73,320 means that Fitzpatrick still pocketed $53,320 of taxpayers' money in 2009.

Concerned Citizens suggested that the council consider hiring a local Tehama County attorney, on a small monthly retainer to handle routine legal matters with a fee agreement for additional work. We felt that this kind of arrangement would be more advantageous and cost effective. However, as is common practice in Corning, the 3-2 majority did what they wanted to do in spite of what might ultimately be in the best interests of the taxpayers and voters of Corning.

Dean Cofer

Concerned Citizens

Corning


See archived 'Letters' stories »
 


Weather
For complete
Corning
weather details
click here
ADVERTISEMENT 
Poll
ADVERTISEMENT 
Games
Comics
Puzzles
Movie Listings